Halloween vs Halloween: original or remake?

Hollywood cinema is running out of ideas. More and more we are seeing remakes and sequels instead of originals. Most of them fail miserably- like War of the Worlds and I am Legend (or, more recently, The Hangover 2)- but some of them are able to pull it off (think Funny Games). While most remakes will never be as good as the original, we have to remember that remaking a movie allows the director to make changes to the plot and characters as they see fit. The remake shouldn’t be identical to the original- after all, if we wanted to watch the exact same movie as the original, we’d just watch the original. It should be as close to it as possible with the notion that some changes are acceptable. Essentially, it becomes its own piece of art, and should be reviewed and criticized as such, with less emphasis to how closely it replicates the original. True, we want something that closely resembles the original, staying true to plot and characterization, but we are allowed to indulge ourselves in the newness of a remake, despite how dramatically it differs from the original.

John Carpenter’s Halloween is a prime example of an original that will always outshine its remake(s). Halloween is a classic that will never die (much like Michael himself). Despite it’s age and lack of quality acting- it may have Jamie Lee Curtis, but let’s be honest, she isn’t very good in it- the original always holds some precedence over the remake, regardless of it’s quality. The 1978 thriller may be dated, but it’s just as terrifying now as it was when it was first released. The eerie silence of Michael’s nature and the effortless stealth he possesses throughout the film make him a horrifyingly silent killer, one who lurks around every dark corner. The modest special effects don’t take away from the horror but rather add to it. The old saying “less is more” holds true for this movie; without the use of gory graphics, the fear remains instilled in the character himself, not necessarily just his actions of murder. The movie doesn’t need it. Most modern horror films rely on blood and gore to carry the fear. Halloween manages to capture true terror in the character of Michael Myers, without the need for elaborate filler.

But, surprisingly, Rob Zombie’s 2007 remake succeeds in adding the gore factor while keeping  the story line (basically) intact. Zombie is notorious for making over-the-top gore flicks laden with overwhelmingly sadistic characters, sickening amounts of blood and heavily x-rated scenes (think House of 1000 Corpses). But he’s able to add his personal touch to the remake without losing the true purpose of the Halloween thriller. True, he takes artistic license and stretches the backstory a bit (okay, a lot), fleshing out the character of Michael Myers more than the original. Some will argue this takes away from the mystery of Michael’s character, but Zombie adds an interesting twist by modifying the character of Laurie Strode. Instead of a random teenage girl Michael decides to stalk and kill-like the original accomplishes- Zombie complicates the plot by making Strode the younger sister to the insane Myers. Though there’s serious speculation on whether Carpenter intended Strode to be Myers’s sister, it was never explicit until the sequels. By being straightforward about this detail, Zombie’s is able to create a new scare, one exclusive to the remake. Zombie’s remake will never compare to Carpenter’s, but at least it’s worth spending two hours watching.

On this most hallowed evening, force yourself to watch (alone, in the dark) one of the most well-known, tricky-treatiest Halloween movies to date: Halloween. The only question remains: which to watch? The original or the remake?

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Entertainment, Halloween, Movies

2 responses to “Halloween vs Halloween: original or remake?

  1. jdc-witherton

    It’s like apples and oranges to me. Granted I am a total fan of the 1978 Vi & VII but I have to give it to the Zombie man on the first remake “Halloween! That being said, He totally ruined what could have been a totally rocking movie if not for the fact that he has to put his wife Sheri Moon Zombie in everything he does. Her walking around with the white horse and the over the top performance by Malcolm McDowell show what a newbie Rob Zombie actually is. He really put a lot of thought into the first remake but the second was like he was stoned and just sitting back saying you do some stuff and you do some other stuff and lets see what happens?? H2 sucked ass but I do like the closing sequence of Laurie in the all white room.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s